Best of this Week Summary 15 - 21 July 2007

Related to this posting which mentions a good article about Continous Integration (CI), I found this interesting article which compares four open source CI tools: CruiseControl, Continuum, Luntbuild and Hudson. In short it is telling you:

CruiseControl:
+ Open source
+ Actively checks your source control system (SCM) for changes
+ Good notification options (including RSS)
- Bit more complex to setup
- Wrapper Ant build script/Maven SCM plugin needed
- Inter-project dependencies not a strong point

Continuum:
+ Open source
+ Easy setup
+ Strong Maven integration
+ Good notification options (though no RSS notification)
- Less extensive list of suppored SCM
- Checks SCM changes on user defined scheduled times (so not actively)
- Inter-project dependencies not a strong point

Luntbuild:
+ Open source
+ Easy setup
+ Most feature-richh of the OSS versions
+ Supports inter-project dependencies
+ Supports many SCMs
+ Separation of build scripts and schedulers
- Not so many notification options
- Checks SCM changes on user defined scheduled times (so not actively)

Hudson:
+ Easy setup (war deployment)
+ Scheduling and ability to poll SCM for changes
+ Good built-in JUnit support
+ Unique fingerprint per build so you can easily find out what was in that build
+ Supports inter-project dependencies
- Not so many notification options (but RSS is available)
- Supports not so many SCMs
- Lack of flexibility (e.g Ant build.xml has to be in your project's root directory)

Conclusion
Looking at the above +s and -s, my conclusion is that for smaller projects where inter-project dependencies are not important, CruiseControl or Continuum can be used. For larger projects with inter-project dependencies, Luntbuild and Hudson are a good option, though you really have to evaluate whether the new kid on the block Hudson is currently mature enough to be used in large projects.

Comparison CSS cleanup tools

Interesting summary about CSS optimization/cleanup/compression tools here.