Showing posts with label jvm. Show all posts
Showing posts with label jvm. Show all posts

Saturday, July 27, 2019

PACT Consumer Driven Contract Testing: how to allow any body in the response


Consumer Driven Contract testing is a way to ensure that services (such as an API provider and a client) can communicate with each other. Without contract testing, the only way to know that services can communicate is by using expensive and brittle integration tests.
PACT is a contract testing tool.  


For response matching you want to be as loose as possible with the matching for the response (will_respond_with(...)) though. This stops the tests being brittle on the provider side.
 Most of the time you don't care about the exact values of the (JSON or XML) response, but you do care about the types of the values, e.g a string or a number.
In that case you'll be using 'type matching'.

Sadly for JVM matchers there's no such handy method that with one invocation makes sure only types are validated, as is for example with Ruby/Groovy/Javascript/Node: Pact::SomethingLike.
Not much documentation on the Java/JVM matchers can be found at the official Pact site itself. Mostly the examples are for Ruby/Groovy/Javascript/Node.

For  the Java and Virtual Machine integration you'd use pact-jvm with matchers like .stringType() for the body using the PACT DSL or this lambda extension.

But hard to find was how to specify allowing either an empty body in the response or any data in the body in the response, while the consumer does not require a body at all (or in other words: is fine with an empty body or any fields in it).
Solution: for that you need to completely omit the .body() in the consumer contract definition.
If you specify a .body(new PactDslJsonBody()), the contract generated matcher will specify "body" : {}, and therefor requiring an empty body. And if then the provider (test) generates one or more fields in the response, you'll see this as the message in the failing test:


Expected an empty Map but received Map(..... fields added by provider ...)


So full example which accepts an empty body or a body with elements in it:

.consumer("Some Consumer")
.hasPactWith("Some Provider")
.given("a certain state on the provider")
    .uponReceiving("a request for something")
        .path("/hello")
        .method("POST")
.toPact()


Tuesday, July 9, 2019

Maven Failsafe plugin build error: SurefireBooterForkException: The forked VM terminated without properly saying goodbye. VM crash or System.exit called?


When you get this exception during running mvn clean verify, which executes both the Surefire and Failsafe plugin (for which the last one uses the Surefire plugin!):

SurefireBooterForkException: The forked VM terminated without properly saying goodbye. VM crash or System.exit called?

it can mean several things. For example as the message says maybe somewhere in your integration tests you call System.exit, which you shouldn't do. That one is easy to find. Also this Stackoverflow post covers that plus some other options, like shortage of memory.

It has also higher chance on happening when using the docker-maven image and 3.x-openjdk-8 or 3.y-openjdk-10.

But if that doesn't fix it, what then?  Then due to this issue you probably have to add this property in your pom.xml in the configuration of both the Surefire and the Failsafe plugin:

<usesystemclassloader>false</usesystemclassloader>

Thus not only for the Failsafe plugin, for both! :)

PS: adding that configuration property also is a workaround for https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1588, also reported here: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/50661648/spring-boot-fails-to-run-maven-surefire-plugin-classnotfoundexception-org-apache/50661649#50661649

Sunday, May 31, 2009

Best of this Week Summary 25 May - 31 May 2009

  • Facebook is now also supporting registration/login via a GMail account and OpenID, see the image below. I especially like that they've implemented it with a lightbox ("popup") so the user doesn't get as much confused anymore, as was the case in the old/standard implementation where the user is completely redirected to Google or the OpenID provider's website. Note that it is actually more "Facebook Connect" like this way! See here another example where OpenID is combined with OAuth to enable a popup login.


  • Understanding how the JVM uses native memory on Windows and Linux. The extensive article explains what native memory is, how the Java runtime uses it, what running out of it looks like (so you're not running out of heap space!), and how to debug a native OutOfMemoryError on Windows and Linux. A companion article covers the same topics for AIX systems.

  • Quite big news was of course Google's announcement of Google Wave at the Google I/O conference. It has been built with GWT. A good description can be found here. It's open source with plugin-like APIs with many integration possibilities. See the 80 minutes video for the full details. It hopes to become the replacement for email... Servers can be run by anybody. Wonder how Google is thinking of making money with it. Ads, just like in GMail? Maybe they are going to charge you for using their Wave server instances (SAAS version)? An interview with Wave's creators can be found here. And six reasons why Wave could be game-changing.

  • Eight generic best practices for scalable high performance systems.

  • Are you any of these two tools with almnost the exact same name? SonarJ is a plug-in for Eclipse that helps you validate your code against a software architecture, using static analysis (free for projects up to 500 classes). And now for the confusion: check also Sonar: enables to collect, analyze and report metrics on source code. It leverages the existing ecosystem of quality open source tools (ex. Checkstyle, PMD, Maven, Cobertura …), to offer a fully integrated solution to development environments and continuous integration tools.